Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 85 score against 80.1. Although the iPhone 8 is older than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's design is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter. The Apple iPhone 8 features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has much more pixels per screen inch, a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little larger display. Apple iPhone 8 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations and a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
IPhone 8 features a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 147% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, iPhone 8 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.