Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
IPhone SE (2022) features a better processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better screen than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a bit larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixel density.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or video in low-light situations, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back camera, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 123% greater battery capacity.
The iPhone SE (2022) not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.