Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Black Glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone II has an overall score of 88, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. The Asus ROG Phone II construction is noticeably thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were released with only 7 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid screen than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Asus ROG Phone II counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Asus ROG Phone II also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone II has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Asus ROG Phone II features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone II counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.