Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone AR, getting a general score of 80.1 against 77.4. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a much newer cellphone than Asus ZenFone AR, although it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster CPU than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores. The Asus ZenFone AR has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Asus ZenFone AR has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery duration than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.