Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 80.3 against 80.1. The Google Nexus 6P is an much older phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a quite greater display density. Google Nexus 6P features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30% greater battery size.
The Google Nexus 6P is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.