Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 80.2 score against 80.1. Even though Google Pixel is way older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is way thinner and extremely lighter. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a higher display pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher number of faster cores. The Google Pixel shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a higher 12.3 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Google Pixel is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.