Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs's 76.9 score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is much newer, but a lot thicker and notably heavier than HTC U11 EYEs. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo OS, while HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a sharper display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better performance than HTC U11 EYEs. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 EYEs captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the HTC U11 EYEs also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. HTC U11 EYEs counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 EYEs also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior battery life than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.