Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even when LG V60 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 1 months apart, LG V60 ThinQ is incredibly thinner and lighter.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.