Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 80.1 against 76.4. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is incredibly newer than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it's incredibly heavier and way thicker.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440px resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of 2700 MHz cores, it also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.