Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is extremely newer, but much heavier and a lot thicker than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has lesser 2700 MHz cpu cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 2560 x 1440px resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way better video quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.