Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 50 is a much newer cellphone, and it is also noticeably lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit worse display density and a bit worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a really bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better video definition and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.