Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, getting an 80.1 score against 79.7. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a way thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G Stylus shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher video quality.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.