Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Moto Z4, with a general score of 80.1 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the Moto Z4, although it's notably heavier and much thicker. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a brighter screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola Moto Z4 features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z4. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z4 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z4. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.