Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a general score of 80.1 against 79.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is older, notably thicker and a lot heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Pro.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a little worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a camera with way more mega-pixels. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro have incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.