Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A12 has a general score of 80.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. The Galaxy A12 construction is way thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A12 has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way higher display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A12 shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A12 features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A12 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A12 features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.