Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 576 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Galaxy A32's body is newer, noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A32. Both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A32 features a bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.