Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy A60 construction is a lot lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released about 10 months before.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A60 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.