Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a global score of 84.2 against 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Samsung was able to make it extremely thinner and notably lighter. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel amount per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.