Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 91.8 score against 80.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a thinner and noticeably lighter device than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were only released with a few months difference.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processor than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a battery lifetime that's just as good as Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery duration.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.