Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Galaxy A80 is an older phone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Samsung could make it incredibly thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display density.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A80, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A80 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has superior battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.