Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 90.5 against 80.1. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with extremely similar battery performance. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition, a lot larger sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.