Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 81 against 80.1. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is incredibly older than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the previous 6.0 Marshmallow version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy C9 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.