Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 88 against 80.1. Galaxy M31s's design is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released only 4 months apart. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy M31s has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M31s, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy M31s features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M31s also has 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better video quality, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has improved battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.