Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 87.1 against 80.1. Galaxy Note9's construction is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released only 20 months before. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note9 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Note9 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the same diafragm aperture and a same size sensor, the Galaxy Note9 also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy Note9 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.