Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Grey and Red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Xperia 5 is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart. Sony Xperia 5 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than Sony Xperia 5, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen pixels density. Xperia 5 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a smaller sensor shooting worse quality pictures, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Xperia 5 also counts with a lot better video definition.
The Sony Xperia 5 features much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Sony Xperia 5 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia 5, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Xperia 5 is also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.