Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Xperia XZ1, with an 80.1 score against 78.3. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is extremely newer, but extremely thicker and extremely heavier than the Xperia XZ1. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZ1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher number of pixels per display inch.
Xperia XZ1 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ1 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ1. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia XZ1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia XZ1. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZ1, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.