Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Xperia XZ2's general score of 79.1. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is extremely newer than Xperia XZ2, it's notably heavier and much thicker. The Xperia XZ2 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of them have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ2 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 19 MP resolution, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.