Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a score of 80.1 against 77.8. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is older, incredibly thicker and heavier than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much worse screen density, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution back camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.