Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 85.5 against 80.1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older device than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's way thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, and they both have a 12 MP camera in the back and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.