Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 Plus is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 81. IPhone 7 Plus is an extremely older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but Apple made it extremely thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy XCover Pro and iPhone 7 Plus both have extremely similar CPUs, although the iPhone 7 Plus has 1 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
Apple iPhone 7 Plus has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a quite worse screen density. The Apple iPhone 7 Plus counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a way lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 7 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 7 Plus, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.