Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. IPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 OS. The iPhone SE (2022) is a incredibly newer device, and it is also way thinner and notably lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
IPhone SE (2022) has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a way smaller screen, a way worse 750 x 1334px resolution and a little worse screen pixel density. IPhone SE (2022) counts with a greater performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone SE (2022) shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone SE (2022) costs a little more money than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.