Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Google Nexus 6P, although it is thicker and heavier. Google Nexus 6P features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels density.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh. The Google Nexus 6P has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations and a camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.