Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is extremely older than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, it's construction is incredibly thinner and extremely lighter. Google Pixel 2's processor is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, both of them have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little better screen density. Galaxy XCover Pro and Google Pixel 2 feature similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video and a back camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.