Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Although the Google Pixel XL is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, it's construction is lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel XL has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Google Pixel XL has a tinier aperture and a camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much better video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.