Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than LG V20's 77 score. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is way newer than the LG V20, it is way thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG V20 features a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 27 percent greater battery capacity. LG V20 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low light environments, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.