Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and also notably newer.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.