Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 81.2 score against 81. Motorola Edge 50 is a notably newer phone, and it is also a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, giving some extra features.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a much higher (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.