Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give you the same operating system features. Galaxy XCover Pro is a heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has more internal memory capacity. Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Stylus, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.