Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's score of 79.9. Both devices we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give all the same OS features. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is a better cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it must be told that it is also an older, thicker and heavier cellphone.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better display density, a bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.