Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A12's 80.3 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, we must note that it is also an older, thicker and just a little heavier cellphone.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and the Galaxy A12 have incredibly similar processors, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way better number of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A12 features a greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A12 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A12 captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.