Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and much more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A32 counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.