Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. The Galaxy A60 is a noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner device than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both were only released 8 months apart. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so they should count with the same operating system features.
Galaxy A60 has a display that is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, a higher pixels count in each inch in the screen and a same size display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A60 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way worse 16 mega pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.