Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having a score of 91.8 against 81. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and Galaxy XCover Pro were only released 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the same OS features.
Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G features a display that is very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a way better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A71 5G is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.