Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having a global score of 84.9 against 81. The Galaxy A80 body has the same weight than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it is a little thinner. Galaxy XCover Pro and Galaxy A80 feature similar processors, and although the Galaxy A80 has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Galaxy A80 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.