Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is way newer than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's heavier and extremely thicker.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite bigger display and a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.