Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 83.3 score against 81. Galaxy M30s is a somewhat lighter and thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were only released 4 months apart. Both phones we are comparing here work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy XCover Pro and the Galaxy M30s both count with really similar CPUs, they have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy M30s has a display that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's screen, because although the Galaxy M30s has a little bit lower screen density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Galaxy M30s takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Galaxy XCover Pro, they have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30s counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.