Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is older than the Galaxy XCover Pro, it's design is just a bit lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a better pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a bit larger display.
Galaxy Note9 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note9 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor. Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 1% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a little more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.