Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ1's global score of 78.3. The Galaxy XCover Pro body is incredibly newer, but much thicker and extremely heavier than Xperia XZ1. Xperia XZ1 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
Xperia XZ1 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels per display inch. Xperia XZ1 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ1 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Sony Xperia XZ1 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with much less megapixels, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better battery duration than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.