Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Xperia XZ3, with a global score of 81 against 79.6. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat heavier phone than the Xperia XZ3, but they are 0.39inches thick.
Xperia XZ3 has a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in low-light environments and a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Galaxy XCover Pro, both of them have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and equal internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3330mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.