Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is extremely older, a bit heavier and notably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a little more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher video quality, a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 41% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.